In a definitive ruling, the Constitutional Court of Zambia has determined that former President Edgar Chagwa Lungu is not eligible to run in the 2026 general elections. This decision settles the long-standing debate about Mr. Lungu’s political future, with the court citing provisions outlined in Article 106 of the Zambian Constitution.
Key Rulings
The court made two significant declarations:
- Eligibility for the 2021 Elections
The court reaffirmed its earlier ruling that Mr. Lungu was eligible to contest the 2021 general elections. This was based on the constitutional interpretation of his term that began after he assumed office in 2015, following the death of then-President Michael Sata.- The court held that Mr. Lungu’s tenure from January 2015 to September 2016 was a full presidential term, as he served more than three years of the late President Sata’s term.
- Despite this, he was permitted to contest the 2016 elections under Article 106(6)(b), which provides allowances for transitional circumstances.
- Ineligibility for 2026 Elections
The court ruled that Mr. Lungu has already served two full terms, having been elected in both 2016 and 2021. Article 106(3) of the Constitution explicitly states that no person can hold the office of President for more than two terms, regardless of whether the terms were consecutive or interrupted.
This interpretation solidifies the constitutional framework governing term limits and disqualifies Mr. Lungu from seeking another term in 2026.
Implications of the Ruling
This judgment marks a significant moment in Zambia’s democratic governance, reinforcing the importance of term limits in safeguarding political stability and continuity. The ruling also underscores the role of the judiciary in upholding constitutional principles amid heightened political discourse.
Public Reactions and Political Landscape
The ruling has elicited mixed reactions across Zambia:
- Supporters of Mr. Lungu expressed disappointment, arguing that his leadership was instrumental in advancing key national projects.
- Critics welcomed the decision, emphasizing the need for a fresh political direction and adherence to constitutional mandates.
The Patriotic Front (PF), Zambia’s largest opposition party and Mr. Lungu’s political base, now faces the challenge of identifying a new leader to spearhead their campaign for the 2026 elections.
Conclusion
The Constitutional Court’s ruling is a landmark decision that affirms Zambia’s commitment to democratic principles. While it marks the end of Mr. Lungu’s presidential ambitions, it opens a new chapter for the nation’s political landscape as the country gears up for the 2026 elections. This decision serves as a reminder of the importance of constitutional fidelity in preserving Zambia’s democratic integrity.